| Jazz Improvisation Institute 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Jazz Improvisation Institute An applied research project funded by the Smith Institute for Applied Research at Johnson C. Smith University
What was this project? The Jazz Improvisation Institute just finished a two-week intensive applied research investigation that focused on the art and discipline of jazz improvisation. This project, funded by the Smith Institute for Applied Research at Johnson C. Smith University, investigated the Initially, areas of inquiry for the researchers included the effects of
Who was involved? The Institute involved 14 participants selected from the Charlotte area as well as Monroe, Waxhaw, Greensboro, NC and Rock Hill, SC. They ranged in age from 14 to 30 and served as informants throughout the research. Participants were chosen because they had prior experience in some combination of jazz camps, private lessons, school and community jazz bands, and they had demonstrated at least basic knowledge of and skills in jazz improvisation. The Institute provided participants a modest stipend and an MP3 player/recorder and will send them an Institute report and DVD. Frank Parker, Board Chair for the Jazz Arts Initiative, served as project director. Barbara Edwards, Board member for the Jazz Arts Initiative, directed the research. Ashlin Parker (trumpet) member of the Grammy-winning New Orleans Jazz Orchestra and part-time faculty member at the University of New Orleans, provided instructional leadership, supported by Dr. Chris Weise (electronic music, Johnson C. Smith University), jazz clinicians: Delfeayo Marsalis (trombone), Ocie Davis (drums), and Will Campbell (saxophone, UNC Charlotte), as well as body work clinicians: John Hook and Hardin Minor. The project was supported by 10 student-assistants from Johnson C. Smith University who were majoring in Music Business and Technologies.
Photos by Kathia Calil and Tom Lucas
What kinds of activities were there? Initial planning for the Institute involved three decision areas:
The particulars of each day were influenced by participants’ reflections that told us what theywere learning that was important to them and what changes they wanted to make next. The three main areas of activities became centered on
In essence, the Improvisation Institute embodied principles of improvisation itself – it was based on pedagogical theories of self-efficacy, best practices of ontological coaching, and the ideas and experiences of master teachers and musicians; and it changed directions based on the communication and collaboration among all participants. What did we learn? We have much data to analyze before we can begin to describe the full extent of our learning about these participants and their learning. We have responses on pre- and post-questionnaires; videotapes of pre- and post-improvisations; videotapes of demonstrations, activities, and discussions; daily plus-delta reflections; and a videotape of their evening concert; as well as reflections upon their practice regimens, their own growth, and where they want to focus next to move forward in their own development. These analyses will yield valuable information to share with participants and others interested in teaching and learning jazz improvisation. However, we will share some preliminary findings. To complete the institute, participants responded to the question: “What actions should I take in the next 6 months to 3 years to improve my jazz improvisation?” Using a modified concept mapping technique with sticky-notes and large chart paper, they identified six categories that captured their multiple individual statements:
What's Next? Project staff will now analyze the data in order to develop written reports and DVD compilations of illustrative moments to use in briefings and presentations for the participants, faculty development through the Smith Center for Applied Research, the Johnson C. Smith community, and the larger community of musicians and audiences concerned with promoting and preserving jazz. |


















